In re Rzepecka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Rzepecka

284 A.D. 867, 134 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D. 867 (In re Rzepecka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rzepecka, 284 A.D. 867, 134 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

. Appeal dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: We are of the opinion that the order denying a reargument is not appealable and therefore the appeal must be dismissed on that ground. (8 Carmody-Wait on New York Practice, § 34, p. 519; Di Martino v. Di Martino, 277 App. Div. 891; Bendon Holding Corp. v. Rodner, 242 App. Div. 233, 237; Weiss v. Weiss, 225 App. Div. 700; Gaston Koch & Co. v. Julette Improvement Co., 136 Misc. 55.) We have also examined the record of the appeal on the merits and are of the opinion that were the appeal so presented and considered we would affirm the order denying reargument. All concur. (Appeal from an order denying petitioner’s application for a rehearing of a habeas corpus proceeding as a result of which petitioner’s writ was dismissed and the child awarded to the custody of the respondents.) Present — Vaughan, J. P., Kimball, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ. [See post, p. 1030.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

. Appeal dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: We are of the opinion that the order denying a reargument is not appealable and therefore the appeal must be dismissed on that ground. (8 Carmody-Wait on New York Practice, § 34, p. 519; Di Martino v. Di Martino, 277 App. Div. 891; Bendon Holding Corp. v. Rodner, 242 App. Div. 233, 237; Weiss v. Weiss, 225 App. Div. 700; Gaston Koch & Co. v. Julette Improvement Co., 136 Misc. 55.) We have also examined the record of the appeal on the merits and are of the opinion that were the appeal so presented and considered we would affirm the order denying reargument. All concur. (Appeal from an order denying petitioner’s application for a rehearing of a habeas corpus proceeding as a result of which petitioner’s writ was dismissed and the child awarded to the custody of the respondents.) Present — Vaughan, J. P., Kimball, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ. [See post, p. 1030.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D. 867, 134 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rzepecka-nyappdiv-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack