In re Rydzewski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Rydzewski

847 A.2d 669, 577 Pa. 552, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 995

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 30, 2004

DocketPetition No. 287 DISC 3, 158 DB 1996, 105 DB 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 847 A.2d 669 (In re Rydzewski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rydzewski, 847 A.2d 669, 577 Pa. 552, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 995 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

[553]*553 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2004, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 3, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Mr. Justice BAER dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[553]*553 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2004, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 3, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Mr. Justice BAER dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

847 A.2d 669, 577 Pa. 552, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rydzewski-pa-2004.