In re Ryan

1 How. N.P. 127
CourtDetroit Recorder's Court
DecidedAugust 18, 1883
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. N.P. 127 (In re Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Detroit Recorder's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ryan, 1 How. N.P. 127 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1883).

Opinion

The Court,

Sweet, J.,

Held: That no rule of a business house could interrupt the prompt service of process or of the order of the court on employees.

The respondent was held guilty of contempt, and the court imposed a fine of twenty dollars or thirty days in. jail.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. N.P. 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ryan-michrecdetroit-1883.