In re Ryan

1 How. N.P. 127

Detroit Recorder's Court·Decided August 18, 1883·Published

Opinion

The Court,

Sweet, J.,

Held: That no rule of a business house could interrupt the prompt service of process or of the order of the court on employees.

The respondent was held guilty of contempt, and the court imposed a fine of twenty dollars or thirty days in. jail.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ryan, 1 How. N.P. 127 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1883).

Pincite

1 How. N.P. 127 (In re Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.