In Re: R.V.G., Appeal of: C.G.

• Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
• Decided: October 21, 2024
• Docket: 272 WDA 2024
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

J-S29001-24

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT O.P. 65.37

IN RE: THE ADOPTION OF R.V.G.,A : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MINOR : PENNSYLVANIA : : APPEAL OF: C.G., FATHER : : : : : No. 272 WDA 2024

Appeal from the Order Entered February 1, 2024 In the Court of Common Pleas of Indiana County Orphans' Court at No(s): No. 32-23-0246

BEFORE: DUBOW, J., KING, J., and BENDER, P.J.E.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY DUBOW, J.: FILED: October 21, 2024

Appellant, C.G., appeals from the February 1, 2024 order entered in the

Indiana County Court of Common Pleas that terminated his parental rights to

eleven-year-old R.V.G. Counsel has filed an Anders1 brief and petition to

withdraw as counsel. Because the certified record is lacking necessary

transcripts, we deny counsel’s petition to withdraw and remand for further

proceedings.

It is well settled that “[c]ounsel who wishes to withdraw [pursuant to

Anders] must file a petition to withdraw stating that he or she has made a

conscientious examination of the record and determined that the appeal would

be frivolous.” Commonwealth v. Yorgey, 188 A.3d 1190, 1195 (Pa. Super.

2018) (en banc). “The substance of the Anders brief must (1) provide a

____________________________________________

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). J-S29001-24

summary of the procedural history and facts, with citations to the record; (2)

refer to anything in the record that counsel believes arguably supports the

appeal; (3) set forth counsel’s conclusion that the appeal is frivolous; and (4)

state counsel’s reasons for concluding that the appeal is frivolous.” Id. at

1196 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “If counsel does not

fulfill the aforesaid technical requirements of Anders, this Court will deny the

petition to withdraw and remand the case with appropriate instructions (e.g.,

directing counsel either to comply with Anders or file an advocate's brief on

Appellant's behalf).” Commonwealth v. Stroud, 298 A.3d 1152, 1157 (Pa.

Super. 2023) (citation omitted). “By contrast, if counsel's petition and brief

satisfy Anders, we will then undertake our own review of the appeal to

determine if it is wholly frivolous.” Id. (citation omitted).

Instantly, counsel failed to ensure that the certified record contained all

transcripts necessary for this Court to conduct appellate review. See

Pa.R.A.P. 1911. “When the record is incomplete, we can neither confirm that

counsel complied with the duty to conscientiously examine the record, nor

conduct our own review to confirm the frivolity of the appeal.” Stroud, 298

A.3d at 1158. Without transcripts of the hearings that precipitated the court’s

February 1, 2024 order on appeal, we lack a complete record and cannot

conduct our Anders review.

Therefore, we deny counsel’s petition to withdraw and order the

following: (1) the Superior Court prothonotary shall vacate the briefing

schedule and the parties’ briefs; (2) the court reporter shall transcribe the

-2- J-S29001-24

notes of testimony from the relevant Orphans’ Court proceedings within 30

days, including but not limited to the hearings occurring on September 28,

2023 and January 29, 2024; (3) the trial court shall thereafter author a

supplemental Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion within 30 days of the completion of

the transcripts and include that supplemental Rule 1925(a) opinion in a

supplemental certified record; (4) the Superior Court prothonotary shall

implement a new, expedited, briefing schedule upon receipt of the

supplemental Rule 1925(a) opinion; and (5) after review of the transcripts,

counsel for Appellant is directed to either comply with Anders or file an

advocate’s brief.

Petition to withdraw denied. Case remanded for proceedings consistent

with this judgment order. Panel jurisdiction retained.

DATE: 10/21/2024

-3-