In re Rutherford

693 N.E.2d 1087, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1211, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1382
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Rutherford. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 Ohio St. 3d 1254
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 6, 1998·No. No. 97-2727·Published

Opinion

On March 6,1998, this court suspended respondent, Guy Rutherford, a.k.a. Guy Darius Rutherford, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On [1212]*1212April 17, 1998, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline submitted an entry pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(l)(c), notifying this court that respondent no longer was in default of the child support order previously submitted to the court. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent, Guy Rutherford, a.k.a. Guy Darius Rutherford, Attorney Registration No. 0066032, be reinstated to the practice of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see In re Rutherford (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 1254, 691 N.E.2d 1049.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg - Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rutherford, 693 N.E.2d 1087, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1211, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1382 (Ohio 1998).

693 N.E.2d 1087 (In re Rutherford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Rutherford
691 N.E.2d 1049 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)