In Re Ruth Reed Dyke, Laura Hamman Fain, and Elizabeth Oliver v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Ruth Reed Dyke, Laura Hamman Fain, and Elizabeth Oliver v. the State of Texas (In Re Ruth Reed Dyke, Laura Hamman Fain, and Elizabeth Oliver v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-23-00410-CV
In re Ruth Reed Dyke, Laura Hamman Fain, and Elizabeth Oliver
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay and for
temporary relief. We temporarily stayed the underlying proceeding and requested responses to
the petition and motion. Having reviewed the petition and records provided, we deny the
petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay and temporary relief, and we lift this Court’s
temporary stay of the underlying proceeding. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a), 52.10(b).
__________________________________________ Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis
Filed: August 17, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Ruth Reed Dyke, Laura Hamman Fain, and Elizabeth Oliver v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ruth-reed-dyke-laura-hamman-fain-and-elizabeth-oliver-v-the-state-texapp-2023.