Home/Supreme Court/In re Ruston

In re Ruston

181 L. Ed. 2d 443, 132 S. Ct. 601, 565 U.S. 1033, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8231, 80 U.S.L.W. 3299
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 14, 2011
DocketNo. 11-6961
StatusPublished

This text of 181 L. Ed. 2d 443 (In re Ruston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ruston, 181 L. Ed. 2d 443, 132 S. Ct. 601, 565 U.S. 1033, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8231, 80 U.S.L.W. 3299 (U.S. 2011).

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 L. Ed. 2d 443, 132 S. Ct. 601, 565 U.S. 1033, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8231, 80 U.S.L.W. 3299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ruston-scotus-2011.