in Re Russell S. Adams
This text of in Re Russell S. Adams (in Re Russell S. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 28, 2022
No. 04-22-00654-CR
IN RE Russell S. ADAMS
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
On October 4, 2022, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Because relator was represented by trial counsel below, his pro se mandamus petition was treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we denied relator’s petition for writ of mandamus by written opinion on October 26, 2022.
On November 14, 2022, relator filed a pro se motion for rehearing in which he urges this court to reconsider the denial of his mandamus petition. After consideration, relator’s motion for rehearing is DENIED. Additionally, relator’s motion to publish our October 26, 2022 opinion is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED on November 28, 2022. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: _____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. CR16-0666, styled The State of Texas v. Russell S. Adams, pending in the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas, the Honorable Susan Harris presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Russell S. Adams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-russell-s-adams-texapp-2022.