In re Rules of the Supreme Court

183 So. 2d 683, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3726
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 4, 1966
DocketNo. 35029
StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 2d 683 (In re Rules of the Supreme Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Rules of the Supreme Court, 183 So. 2d 683, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3726 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rule II, Section 10(2) relating to admissions to The Florida Bar and which was adopted by this court on July 10th, 1963, is hereby amended to read as follows:—

“Rule II, Section 10(2)
“Evidence satisfactory to the Board prior to the applicant’s admission to the examination that the applicant is a graduate of an accredited law school. After July 1, 1966, the applicant shall also furnish evidence satisfactory to the Board that he has successfully completed a regular classroom course in Legal Ethics, or in lieu thereof the applicant be required to file with the Board a sworn statement reciting that he has carefully and thoughtfully read the Canons of Ethics governing the conduct of lawyers and judges as adopted by the Supreme Court of Florida.”

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 So. 2d 683, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rules-of-the-supreme-court-fla-1966.