In re Rudy

378 A.2d 1019, 250 Pa. Super. 442, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2355
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 6, 1977·No. No. 592 and 593·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

These consolidated appeals arise from adjudications of the Blair County Juvenile Court which Ordered, inter alia, that the adjudged delinquents each pay a fine. The appeals contest the propriety of the imposition of a fine against a juvenile. We must reverse the Orders of the lower court as to the fine in accordance with our recent decision in In re Gardini, 243 Pa.Super. 338, 365 A.2d 1252 (1976).

Reversed with directions to make a disposition of the cases not inconsistent with the case of In re Gardini.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rudy, 378 A.2d 1019, 250 Pa. Super. 442, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2355 (Pa. Ct. App. 1977).

378 A.2d 1019 (In re Rudy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of Carroll
393 A.2d 993 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)