In re Rudy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

In re Rudy

378 A.2d 1019, 250 Pa. Super. 442, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2355

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 6, 1977

DocketNo. 592 and 593

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 378 A.2d 1019 (In re Rudy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rudy, 378 A.2d 1019, 250 Pa. Super. 442, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2355 (Pa. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

These consolidated appeals arise from adjudications of the Blair County Juvenile Court which Ordered, inter alia, that the adjudged delinquents each pay a fine. The appeals contest the propriety of the imposition of a fine against a juvenile. We must reverse the Orders of the lower court as to the fine in accordance with our recent decision in In re Gardini, 243 Pa.Super. 338, 365 A.2d 1252 (1976).

Reversed with directions to make a disposition of the cases not inconsistent with the case of In re Gardini.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

These consolidated appeals arise from adjudications of the Blair County Juvenile Court which Ordered, inter alia, that the adjudged delinquents each pay a fine. The appeals contest the propriety of the imposition of a fine against a juvenile. We must reverse the Orders of the lower court as to the fine in accordance with our recent decision in In re Gardini, 243 Pa.Super. 338, 365 A.2d 1252 (1976).

Reversed with directions to make a disposition of the cases not inconsistent with the case of In re Gardini.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

378 A.2d 1019, 250 Pa. Super. 442, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rudy-pasuperct-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack