In Re Rudy
This text of In Re Rudy (In Re Rudy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE CHRISTOPHER J. RUDY
______________________
2011-1556 (Serial No. 08/683, 105) ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
JUDGMENT ______________________
CHRISTOPHER J. RUDY, of Port Huron, Michigan, pro se.
COKE MORGAN STEWART, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor and THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, Bryson, Circuit Judges, and Fogel, District Judge * ).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 21, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
* Honorable Jeremy Fogel, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Rudy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rudy-cafc-2012.