In re Rudolph

D.C. Circuit

In re Rudolph

38 App. D.C. 547, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2168

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 4, 1912

DocketNo. 383

StatusPublished

This text of 38 App. D.C. 547 (In re Rudolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rudolph, 38 App. D.C. 547, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2168 (D.C. Cir. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The interlocutory order from which this special appeal is applied for was entered March 18, and the application was delayed until April 3. Under the rules of the court relating to filing transcripts, printing record, and printing and filing briefs, this appeal, if granted, could not be heard until the October term, There seems no good reason why the final decree should not be entered in the case, and the appeal regularly taken. For these reasons the application is denied. Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The interlocutory order from which this special appeal is applied for was entered March 18, and the application was delayed until April 3. Under the rules of the court relating to filing transcripts, printing record, and printing and filing briefs, this appeal, if granted, could not be heard until the October term, There seems no good reason why the final decree should not be entered in the case, and the appeal regularly taken. For these reasons the application is denied. Denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 App. D.C. 547, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rudolph-cadc-1912.