In re Rudin

172 A.D.2d 115, 578 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15935
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court on January 13, 1970. On February 2, 1990, he was suspended from practice by this court for two years and until further order of this court (Matter of Rudin, 153 AD2d 338).

On September 13, 1991, respondent was convicted by the United States District Court for the Western District of New [116] York, following a plea of guilty, of the crime of filing a false income tax return (26 USC § 7207), a serious crime as defined by Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (d). Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g), respondent was directed to show cause why a final order of discipline should not be entered.

After consideration of the mitigating circumstance that there was no additional tax liability, we conclude that he should be suspended for a period of six months, commencing February 2, 1992, and until further order of the court.

Callahan, A. P. J., Doerr, Denman, Green and Balio, JJ., concur.

Final order of suspension entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (h).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rudin, 172 A.D.2d 115, 578 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15935 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

172 A.D.2d 115 (In re Rudin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Lambert
464 S.E.2d 582 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1995)