In re Rudin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Rudin

172 A.D.2d 115, 578 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15935

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 172 A.D.2d 115 (In re Rudin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rudin, 172 A.D.2d 115, 578 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15935 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court on January 13, 1970. On February 2, 1990, he was suspended from practice by this court for two years and until further order of this court (Matter of Rudin, 153 AD2d 338).

On September 13, 1991, respondent was convicted by the United States District Court for the Western District of New [116]*116York, following a plea of guilty, of the crime of filing a false income tax return (26 USC § 7207), a serious crime as defined by Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (d). Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g), respondent was directed to show cause why a final order of discipline should not be entered.

After consideration of the mitigating circumstance that there was no additional tax liability, we conclude that he should be suspended for a period of six months, commencing February 2, 1992, and until further order of the court.

Callahan, A. P. J., Doerr, Denman, Green and Balio, JJ., concur.

Final order of suspension entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (h).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI