in Re Ruby v. Ludwig

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 18, 2004·No. 03-04-00464-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN



NO. 03-04-00464-CV

NO. 03-04-00466-CV

In re Ruby V. Ludwig

&

In re Joy Higdon



ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

O R D E R



The attorneys ad litem for the children have filed a motion for rehearing with this Court. The motion is overruled. However, we note that our opinion stated that the writ would issue only in the event that the trial court did not (1) vacate its order terminating Higdon's parent child relationship and (2) dismiss the department's SAPCR. Relator Ludwig's intervention is unaffected by the trial court's dismissal of the department's SAPCR. See In re Bishop, 8 S.W.3d 412, 420 (Tex. App.--Waco 1999, pet. denied) (section 263.401 only requires dismissal of department's suit). All issues concerning conservatorship and possession of the children remain pending in the trial court.

It is ORDERED this 18th day of November 2004.



Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Ruby v. Ludwig, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

in Re Ruby v. Ludwig (in Re Ruby v. Ludwig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Bishop
8 S.W.3d 412 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)