In re Rubin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Rubin

117 So. 3d 92, 2013 WL 2150830, 2013 La. LEXIS 1148

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 17, 2013·No. No. 2013-B-0845·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that he negligently practiced law while ineligible to do so. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Gregory Ross Rubin, Louisiana Bar Roll number 31536, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty [93] days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that he negligently practiced law while ineligible to do so. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Gregory Ross Rubin, Louisiana Bar Roll number 31536, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty [93] days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

In re Rubin, 117 So. 3d 92, 2013 WL 2150830, 2013 La. LEXIS 1148 (La. 2013).

Pincite

117 So. 3d 92 (In re Rubin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.