In re Rubin
This text of 117 So. 3d 92 (In re Rubin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that he negligently practiced law while ineligible to do so. Having reviewed the petition,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Gregory Ross Rubin, Louisiana Bar Roll number 31536, be publicly reprimanded.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty [93]*93days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 So. 3d 92, 2013 WL 2150830, 2013 La. LEXIS 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rubin-la-2013.