in Re Ruben Serna
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-18-00007-CR
IN RE RUBEN SERNA
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 17, 2018 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED Relator Ruben Serna filed this pro se petition for writ of mandamus on January 5, 2018.
Relator has been appointed trial counsel to represent him in connection with the criminal charges currently pending against him in all three trial cause numbers. Relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2015CR9771, 2016CR10100, 2017CR1340A, styled The State of Texas v. Ruben Serna, pending in the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jefferson Moore presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Ruben Serna (in Re Ruben Serna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.