in Re Ruben Espronceda, Ramon and Rafael Espronceda, Minors and William A. Mallow
Opinion
Trial Court No. 2000-CI-14767
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Tom Rickhoff, Justice
Paul Green, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 13, 2000
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED
On November 3, 2000, relators filed a Motion for Accelerated Appeal, Petition for Declaratory judgment, Mandamus, Injunction, or Quo Warranto. On November 16, 2000, the real party in interest, the City of San Antonio, filed a motion to dismiss, which the relators oppose.
This court has determined that relators are not entitled to the relief sought because the petition for writ of mandamus does not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3(j)(1)(A). Therefore, the petition is DENIED, without prejudice to relators pursuing their complaints on appeal and in compliance with the appropriate Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). The City of San Antonio's motion to dismiss is DENIED.
Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Ruben Espronceda, Ramon and Rafael Espronceda, Minors and William A. Mallow (in Re Ruben Espronceda, Ramon and Rafael Espronceda, Minors and William A. Mallow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.