In re Royot
This text of 834 So. 2d 427 (In re Royot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Royot, Nathalie; Marty, Vero-nique; Moguen, Celine; Jarry, Guill-aume; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Permission to Take Bar Examination.
Not considered. As to petitioners Na-thalie Royot, Veronique Marty, and Celine Moguen, there has been no showing that their qualifications for admission have changed since this Court denied their prior applications. In the absence of such a showing, this Court will not consider a new application from these petitioners. As to [428]*428petitioner Guillaume Jarry, the application is premature, as there is no indication petitioner has applied for admission to the Committee on Bar Admissions. See Supreme Court Rule XVII.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
834 So. 2d 427, 2003 La. LEXIS 36, 2003 WL 170170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-royot-la-2003.