in Re Roy Watters
This text of in Re Roy Watters (in Re Roy Watters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 19, 2018
No. 04-18-00333-CV
IN RE Roy WATTERS
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
On May 22, 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, and the real parties in interest filed a response. After considering the petition and response, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on July 19, 2018.
_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of July, 2018.
___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 16616B, styled Mike Lopez and Tiffany Liesmann v. Roy Watters, pending in the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas, the Honorable M. Rex Emerson presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Roy Watters, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roy-watters-texapp-2018.