In re Roy

96 F. 400, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 330
CourtDistrict Court, D. Vermont
DecidedSeptember 5, 1899
DocketNo. 101
StatusPublished

This text of 96 F. 400 (In re Roy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Roy, 96 F. 400, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 330 (D. Vt. 1899).

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

The bankrupt appears to have had, when making his petition and schedules, an accident insurance policy, on which dues had accrued and had been paid to him to the amount of $37.50, which he had after his petition and schedules were made, and just before signing them. In the schedule calling for cash on hand he said, “Hone,” and in that calling for insurance policies he said, “None,” and with the petition and schedule he filed an affidavit stating that he was without means to pay the fees, and could not obtain the money to pay the same. Such a policy, on which nothing had accrued, and which had no surrender value, probably, would not pass to the trustee, and a mere omission of it from the schedules might not be serious; but money in hand received from it would be cash on hand, and that which had accrued due an asset. The schedules appear to have been false, and also the affidavit, whether the money was due and unpaid, or had been paid and was on hand; and the making of them under oath is such an offense under the law as, to, by the terms of the law, bar a discharge. This application for a discharge must therefore be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 F. 400, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roy-vtd-1899.