In Re Roy J. Elizondo III v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Roy J. Elizondo III v. the State of Texas (In Re Roy J. Elizondo III v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued February 23, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00145-CV ——————————— IN RE ROY J. ELIZONDO III, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On February 22, 2024, Roy J. Elizondo III filed a petition for writ of
mandamus challenging the trial court’s June 20, 2023 order granting partial
summary judgment in favor of Cadence Bank, N.A.1 We deny the petition.
1 The underlying case is Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Roy J. Elizondo III and Roy J. Elizondo III PLLC, cause number 2014-65226, pending in the 234th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Lauren Reeder presiding. Elizondo’s request for an emergency stay of the underlying proceedings is dismissed
as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Hightower.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Roy J. Elizondo III v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roy-j-elizondo-iii-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.