In re Roxroy R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Roxroy R.

101 A.D.3d 484, 954 N.Y.2d 869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 101 A.D.3d 484 (In re Roxroy R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Roxroy R., 101 A.D.3d 484, 954 N.Y.2d 869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

The disposition was the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection, and was a proper exercise of discretion (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]). The underlying [485]*485incident was serious and violent, and the length and conditions of probation were not unduly punitive. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The disposition was the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection, and was a proper exercise of discretion (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]). The underlying [485]*485incident was serious and violent, and the length and conditions of probation were not unduly punitive. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 A.D.3d 484, 954 N.Y.2d 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roxroy-r-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack