In re Roxann Joyce M.

New York Court of Appeals

In re Roxann Joyce M.

454 N.E.2d 123, 60 N.Y.2d 564, 467 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3291

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 12, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 454 N.E.2d 123 (In re Roxann Joyce M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Roxann Joyce M., 454 N.E.2d 123, 60 N.Y.2d 564, 467 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3291 (N.Y. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for review of the facts in light of Santosky v Kramer (455 US 745), or, in its [567]*567discretion, remission to Family Court for a de novo hearing (cf. Matter of Michael B., 58 NY2d 71).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for review of the facts in light of Santosky v Kramer (455 US 745), or, in its [567]*567discretion, remission to Family Court for a de novo hearing (cf. Matter of Michael B., 58 NY2d 71).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

454 N.E.2d 123, 60 N.Y.2d 564, 467 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roxann-joyce-m-ny-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack