In re Roxann Joyce M.
454 N.E.2d 123, 60 N.Y.2d 564, 467 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3291
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for review of the facts in light of Santosky v Kramer (455 US 745), or, in its [567]*567discretion, remission to Family Court for a de novo hearing (cf. Matter of Michael B., 58 NY2d 71).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Roxann Joyce M., 454 N.E.2d 123, 60 N.Y.2d 564, 467 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3291 (N.Y. 1983).
454 N.E.2d 123 (In re Roxann Joyce M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Roxann M.
104 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)