In re Rowe

505 N.E.2d 609, 69 N.Y.2d 757, 513 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 15339
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 10, 1987·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

In view of the fact that the petitioner was found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, as a result of which he is still receiving court-ordered psychiatric care, and the additional fact that the affidavit of his own psychiatrist is not sufficient to raise an issue of fact in support of his mental fitness to practice law, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in denying the application without a hearing.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rowe, 505 N.E.2d 609, 69 N.Y.2d 757, 513 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 15339 (N.Y. 1987).

505 N.E.2d 609 (In re Rowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Rowe
191 A.D.2d 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re Rowe
537 N.E.2d 616 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)