In re Rowe

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Rowe

768 So. 2d 593, 2000 La. LEXIS 2165, 2000 WL 1234246

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided August 24, 2000·No. No. 2000-B-2312·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition for Interim Suspension filed by respondent, Charles R. Rowe, and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that Charles R. Rowe be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.3, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately-

/s/ Walter F. Marcus, Jr. Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

VICTORY, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition for Interim Suspension filed by respondent, Charles R. Rowe, and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that Charles R. Rowe be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.3, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately-

/s/ Walter F. Marcus, Jr. Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

VICTORY, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.

In re Rowe, 768 So. 2d 593, 2000 La. LEXIS 2165, 2000 WL 1234246 (La. 2000).

Pincite

768 So. 2d 593 (In re Rowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related