In re Rovner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Rovner

754 A.2d 553, 164 N.J. 616, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 995

DecidedJuly 19, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 754 A.2d 553 (In re Rovner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rovner, 754 A.2d 553, 164 N.J. 616, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 995 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that ROBERT ROVNER of FEASTERVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA, a member of the Pennsylvania bar who has consented to the jurisdiction of this Court, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), and RPC 5.1(b) (failure to supervise attorneys), which misconduct occurred while respondent served as the managing partner of a Pennsylvania law firm with a New Jersey practice, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT ROVNER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file maintained within this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that ROBERT ROVNER of FEASTERVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA, a member of the Pennsylvania bar who has consented to the jurisdiction of this Court, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), and RPC 5.1(b) (failure to supervise attorneys), which misconduct occurred while respondent served as the managing partner of a Pennsylvania law firm with a New Jersey practice, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT ROVNER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file maintained within this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

754 A.2d 553, 164 N.J. 616, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rovner-nj-2000.