In Re Rountree Riley Goodmon in Re George T. Johnson

51 F.3d 266, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13087, 1995 WL 147285
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 5, 1995
Docket94-8099
StatusUnpublished

This text of 51 F.3d 266 (In Re Rountree Riley Goodmon in Re George T. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Rountree Riley Goodmon in Re George T. Johnson, 51 F.3d 266, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13087, 1995 WL 147285 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

51 F.3d 266

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re Rountree Riley GOODMON; In re George T. Johnson, Petitioners.

No. 94-8099.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 1995.
Decided April 5, 1995.

Rountree Riley Goodmon, George T. Johnson, petitioners pro se.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Rountree Riley Goodmon and George T. Johnson petition this Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to rule on their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) action consistent with this Court's partial reversal and remand decided on October 29, 1991. Goodmon v. Rockefeller, 947 F.2d 1186 (4th Cir.1991). Because the district court is proceeding to resolve this matter, having entered its latest order in this case within the last month, we deny the relief requested. We note that Petitioners may file another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Petitioners' petition for writ of mandamus. Because there are no complex or substantial issues presented in this appeal, we deny Petitioners' motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodmon v. Rockefeller
947 F.2d 1186 (Fourth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 F.3d 266, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13087, 1995 WL 147285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rountree-riley-goodmon-in-re-george-t-johnso-ca4-1995.