In re Rothstone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Rothstone

10 A.D.2d 605, 197 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11904

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 605 (In re Rothstone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rothstone, 10 A.D.2d 605, 197 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

The order appealed from unanimously modified on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents, by reducing the allowances awarded as follows: to the special guardian $1,500; to the attorney for the committee $2,000; and to each of the two firms of attorneys representing the trustee under the will of the decedent $500'; and, as so modified, the order is affirmed. The allowances as reduced constitute fair and reasonable compensation for the services rendered in this proceeding. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Prank, Yalente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The order appealed from unanimously modified on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents, by reducing the allowances awarded as follows: to the special guardian $1,500; to the attorney for the committee $2,000; and to each of the two firms of attorneys representing the trustee under the will of the decedent $500'; and, as so modified, the order is affirmed. The allowances as reduced constitute fair and reasonable compensation for the services rendered in this proceeding. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Prank, Yalente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 605, 197 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rothstone-nyappdiv-1960.