In re Rothman

886 A.2d 1053, 185 N.J. 396, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1613
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 7, 2005·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-205, concluding that HARVEY H. ROTH-MAN of WAYNE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.8(a) (improper business transaction with a client), RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds), RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver funds to a third person), RPC 1.15(d) (record-keeping violations), and RPC 5.3(a) and (b) (failure to properly supervise a non-lawyer), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HARVEY H. ROTHMAN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rothman, 886 A.2d 1053, 185 N.J. 396, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1613 (N.J. 2005).

886 A.2d 1053 (In re Rothman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.