In re Rothbard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Rothbard

229 A.D. 741

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 229 A.D. 741 (In re Rothbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rothbard, 229 A.D. 741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to vacate order of disbarment denied. Motion to reopen hearing for the taking of further proof granted, and matter remitted to Hon. Harrington Putnam, official referee, to take further proof in connection with the charges and to report. While we have heretofore denied a similar motion, upon further consideration, and particularly in view of respondent’s claim that there had not been an opportunity to examine and present the testimony given before Mr. Justice Faber, and that he had not obtained the benefit of the testimony before the referee of all the doctors who had been examined before Mr. Justice Faber, we now conclude that a rehearing is advisable. The testimony taken before Mr. Justice Faber, in so far as it may be applicable, will be delivered to the official referee, who is authorized to permit the parties to examine same at such times as he may deem proper. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to vacate order of disbarment denied. Motion to reopen hearing for the taking of further proof granted, and matter remitted to Hon. Harrington Putnam, official referee, to take further proof in connection with the charges and to report. While we have heretofore denied a similar motion, upon further consideration, and particularly in view of respondent’s claim that there had not been an opportunity to examine and present the testimony given before Mr. Justice Faber, and that he had not obtained the benefit of the testimony before the referee of all the doctors who had been examined before Mr. Justice Faber, we now conclude that a rehearing is advisable. The testimony taken before Mr. Justice Faber, in so far as it may be applicable, will be delivered to the official referee, who is authorized to permit the parties to examine same at such times as he may deem proper. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 A.D. 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rothbard-nyappdiv-1930.