In re Rostoker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Rostoker

871 A.2d 787

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 24, 2005

DocketNo. 991 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 871 A.2d 787 (In re Rostoker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rostoker, 871 A.2d 787 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2005, a Rule having been entered by this Court on January 31, 2005, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Michael David Rostoker to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Michael David Rostoker is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2005, a Rule having been entered by this Court on January 31, 2005, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Michael David Rostoker to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Michael David Rostoker is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

871 A.2d 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rostoker-pa-2005.