In Re Ross Wyatt Anderson v. the State of Texas

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: March 13, 2025
• Docket: 13-24-00650-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-24-00650-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE ROSS WYATT ANDERSON

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices Silva and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva1

By petition for writ of mandamus, relator Ross Wyatt Anderson asserted that the

trial court abused its discretion by rendering an “Order for Writ of Attachment.” Relator

assailed this order by four issues concerning notice and service of process. However,

relator has now filed a “Motion for Non-Suit” regarding this original proceeding. He

requests that we “enter a non-suit,” “without prejudice to refile same with costs of suit

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not

required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). taxed against [him].” We construe relator’s motion for nonsuit as a motion to dismiss and

proceed accordingly.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus,

relator’s motion, and the applicable law, is of the opinion that this original proceeding

should be dismissed. Accordingly, having previously abated this case, we now reinstate

it. We lift the stay order that we previously imposed regarding the “Order for Writ of

Attachment.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10 (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting

temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”). We grant relator’s motion,

and we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus without prejudice. Costs will be taxed

against relator.

CLARISSA SILVA Justice

Delivered and filed on the 13th day of March, 2025.