In re Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ross

214 A.D.2d 295, 632 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10500

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 214 A.D.2d 295 (In re Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ross, 214 A.D.2d 295, 632 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10500 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

By order of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, dated May 18, 1995, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law for a period of 30 days, effective June 18, 1995.

[296]*296On July 12, 1995, the respondent was served with a notice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3 (d), informing him of his right to impose certain enumerated defenses to the imposition of discipline in New York. The respondent submitted a verified statement in response to the notice, but did not demand a hearing.

Under the circumstances of this case, the respondent is censured for his professional misconduct.

Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan, Balletta and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent, Bryan S. Ross, is censured for his misconduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI