Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Ross

In re Ross

214 A.D.2d 295, 632 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10500
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Ross. Read the opinion of the Court — 231 A.D.2d 640 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 1995·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

By order of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, dated May 18, 1995, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law for a period of 30 days, effective June 18, 1995.

[296]*296On July 12, 1995, the respondent was served with a notice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3 (d), informing him of his right to impose certain enumerated defenses to the imposition of discipline in New York. The respondent submitted a verified statement in response to the notice, but did not demand a hearing.

Under the circumstances of this case, the respondent is censured for his professional misconduct.

Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan, Balletta and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent, Bryan S. Ross, is censured for his misconduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ross, 214 A.D.2d 295, 632 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10500 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

214 A.D.2d 295 (In re Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.