In re Ross

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Ross

592 A.2d 1213, 125 N.J. 189, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 1294

DecidedJuly 30, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 592 A.2d 1213 (In re Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ross, 592 A.2d 1213, 125 N.J. 189, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 1294 (N.J. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

WILLIAM J. ROSS of TOTOWA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM J. ROSS is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

WILLIAM J. ROSS of TOTOWA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM J. ROSS is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 A.2d 1213, 125 N.J. 189, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 1294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ross-nj-1991.