In Re Ross
715 N.W.2d 776, 475 Mich. 881
This text of 715 N.W.2d 776 (In Re Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In Re Ross, 715 N.W.2d 776, 475 Mich. 881 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
In re Dushawn Marquis ROSS and Tavone Donald Ruffin, Minors.
Department of Human Services, f/k/a Family Independence Agency, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Romunda Williams, Respondent-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Urban
715 N.W.2d 776 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
715 N.W.2d 776, 475 Mich. 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ross-mich-2006.