In re Ross

California Court of Appeal

In re Ross

17 Cal. App. 676

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 18, 1911

DocketCrim. No. 231

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Cal. App. 676 (In re Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ross, 17 Cal. App. 676 (Cal. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The writ must be denied for various reasons. First, the evidence had upon the preliminary examination is not authenticated in any manner. Second, while the aggressive acts of defendant were directed toward a third party, they were done in the presence of the officer and so terrorized him that he was prevented from discharging a duty and the effect of which was to resist such officer. As to the other offense of assault with a deadly weapon, it may be, if the case of People v. Sylva, 143 Cal. 62, [78 Pac. 814], is to be followed as a correct exposition of the law, that upon a final trial it might be held insufficient to warrant a conviction of the exact offense charged, although not of lesser offenses embraced therein. But upon a preliminary hearing, we regard the unauthenticated evidence presented as insufficient, even if authenticated, to warrant the writ.

Assuming that reasonable grounds are shown to warrant the magistrate in binding the petitioner over, the bail is n-ot excessive.

Writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The writ must be denied for various reasons. First, the evidence had upon the preliminary examination is not authenticated in any manner. Second, while the aggressive acts of defendant were directed toward a third party, they were done in the presence of the officer and so terrorized him that he was prevented from discharging a duty and the effect of which was to resist such officer. As to the other offense of assault with a deadly weapon, it may be, if the case of People v. Sylva, 143 Cal. 62, [78 Pac. 814], is to be followed as a correct exposition of the law, that upon a final trial it might be held insufficient to warrant a conviction of the exact offense charged, although not of lesser offenses embraced therein. But upon a preliminary hearing, we regard the unauthenticated evidence presented as insufficient, even if authenticated, to warrant the writ.

Assuming that reasonable grounds are shown to warrant the magistrate in binding the petitioner over, the bail is n-ot excessive.

Writ denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Cal. App. 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ross-calctapp-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack