In Re: Ross

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedSeptember 15, 2014
Docket13-1660
StatusUnpublished

This text of In Re: Ross (In Re: Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Ross, (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE RUSSELL G. ROSS AND REBECCA B. KANE ______________________

2013-1660 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 10/975,277. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for appellants. With her on the brief were BRIDGET HEFFERNAN LABUTTA, DAVID V. RADACK, and PHILIP E. LEVY.

LORE A. UNT, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and FRANCES M. LYNCH, Associate Solicitor. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 15, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Ross, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ross-cafc-2014.