In re Ross

Fourth Circuit

In re Ross

108 F. App'x 786

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 3, 2004·No. No. 04-7147·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William A. Ross petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motions to amend the criminal judgment and for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The district court has already ruled [787]*787on both motions. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William A. Ross petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motions to amend the criminal judgment and for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The district court has already ruled [787]*787on both motions. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

In re Ross, 108 F. App'x 786 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

108 F. App'x 786 (In re Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.