In re Ross

Second Circuit

In re Ross

200 F. 1023, 118 C.C.A. 665, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1936

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 2, 1912

DocketNo. 178

StatusPublished

This text of 200 F. 1023 (In re Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ross, 200 F. 1023, 118 C.C.A. 665, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1936 (2d Cir. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an application to have inserted in the record the time and place of the death of Fridolf F. Wenderlin. We understand that there is no dispute as to the fact that Wenderlin. died in the Flushing Hospital on the 21st of July, 1909. This being so, and there-being no necessity for taking further testimony, we think the best disposition of this motion will be to postpone it until the argument of the appeal, when it can be disposed of in the light of all the facts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an application to have inserted in the record the time and place of the death of Fridolf F. Wenderlin. We understand that there is no dispute as to the fact that Wenderlin. died in the Flushing Hospital on the 21st of July, 1909. This being so, and there-being no necessity for taking further testimony, we think the best disposition of this motion will be to postpone it until the argument of the appeal, when it can be disposed of in the light of all the facts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 F. 1023, 118 C.C.A. 665, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ross-ca2-1912.