In re Rosner

42 A.D.2d 113, 345 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3906
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 1973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar in the Second Department on April 5, 1962.

On March 20, 1973, respondent was convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, among other things, of the crime of bribery, a felony.

Petitioner Association of the Bar of the City of New York seeks to have respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys. Such action is mandatory (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd. 4; Matter of Barash, 20 N Y 2d 154, 157). Respondent contends, however, that under the law of the State of New York the crime involved is not a felony. The applicable statute is section 200.00 of the New York revised Penal Law. (See Matter of Brouner, 38 A D 2d 94 [1st Dept., 1972]; cf. People v. Chapman, 13 N Y 2d 97.)

[114]*114The petition is granted and respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Nunez, J. P., Kupferman, Steuer, Tilzer and Capozzoli, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rosner, 42 A.D.2d 113, 345 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

42 A.D.2d 113 (In re Rosner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Schwartz
50 A.D.2d 377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)