In re Rosner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Rosner

640 A.2d 788, 135 N.J. 349, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 419

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 2, 1994·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court on the application for restoration to practice of EDWARD J. ROSNER of ROSEMONT, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, and who was suspended from the practice of law by Order of this Court dated January 2, 1991, for failure to pay administrative costs ordered in a disciplinary matter;

And respondent having paid the administrative costs, together with interest and a sanction, to the Ethics Financial Committee;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EDWARD J. ROSNER be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court on the application for restoration to practice of EDWARD J. ROSNER of ROSEMONT, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, and who was suspended from the practice of law by Order of this Court dated January 2, 1991, for failure to pay administrative costs ordered in a disciplinary matter;

And respondent having paid the administrative costs, together with interest and a sanction, to the Ethics Financial Committee;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EDWARD J. ROSNER be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.

In re Rosner, 640 A.2d 788, 135 N.J. 349, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 419 (N.J. 1994).

Pincite

640 A.2d 788 (In re Rosner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.