In re Rosenson
This text of 248 A.D. 823 (In re Rosenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county, settling the accounts of the administratrix, modified (1) by striking therefrom the provision surcharging the administratrix with the sum of $350; (2) by striking therefrom the provisions for commissions, $60.45, and for counsel •fees, $100, and (3) by reducing from $332.94 to $143.39 the amount to be paid to Julie Stein on account of her allowed claim and interest; and as so modified, unanimously affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion (a) that the surcharge of $350 was erroneous as such amount was received by Etta Rosenson (later administratrix) for the account of the deceased in his lifetime (Matter of McAleenan, 53 App. Div. 193; affd., 165 N. Y. 645); and (b) that in view of the small balance remaining in the estate and of other relevant circumstances, there should be no award of commissions or counsel fees. In accordance with this decision the account as readjusted will be as follows:
The administratrix is charged:
With amount of Schedule A-l, as originally filed.................... $1,909 95
The administratrix is credited with:
The amounts not collected in Schedule B................ $700 00
With the amount of Schedule C-l, as filed............... 1,004 56
With the amount of Schedule D........................ 62 00
- 1,766 56
Leaving a balance of........................................ $143 39
payable to Julie Stein on account of her claim besides seventy-five dollars costs imposed on administratrix personally. In view of this decision, the appeal from the order denying the motion of the administratrix to resettle the decree is dismissed, without costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 823, 289 N.Y.S. 226, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rosenson-nyappdiv-1936.