In re Rosenfield

D. New Jersey

In re Rosenfield

20 F. Cas. 1205, 1 Nat. Bank. Reg. 319

DecidedJuly 1, 1868

StatusPublished

This text of 20 F. Cas. 1205 (In re Rosenfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rosenfield, 20 F. Cas. 1205, 1 Nat. Bank. Reg. 319 (D.N.J. 1868).

Pincite

Opinion

FIELD, District Judge.

I am of opinion that the question propounded to the witness, and excluded by the register, was not a proper question to be put, for the reasons stated by the register in the foregoing, but am also of the opinion that under general order No. 10, the register had no power to decide on the competency, materiality, or relevancy of the question, and was therefore wrong in excluding it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FIELD, District Judge.

I am of opinion that the question propounded to the witness, and excluded by the register, was not a proper question to be put, for the reasons stated by the register in the foregoing, but am also of the opinion that under general order No. 10, the register had no power to decide on the competency, materiality, or relevancy of the question, and was therefore wrong in excluding it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 F. Cas. 1205, 1 Nat. Bank. Reg. 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rosenfield-njd-1868.