In re Rosenfeld
This text of 11 A.D.2d 324 (In re Rosenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On February 18, 1960, respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crime of attempted extortion, which is a felony (Penal Law, § 850 et seq.). Pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, respondent then ceased to be a member of the Bar.
The statutory provision is mandatory and upon proof of conviction an order of disbarment follows as a matter of course, notwithstanding the pendency of an appeal from the judgment of conviction (Matter of Lindheim, 195 App. Div. 827; Matter of Scotti, 266 App. Div. 279).
The respondent should be disbarred.
Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Yalente and McNally, JJ., concur.
Respondent disbarred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 A.D.2d 324, 205 N.Y.S.2d 189, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rosenfeld-nyappdiv-1960.