In re Rosenfeld

11 A.D.2d 324, 205 N.Y.S.2d 189, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8010

This text of 11 A.D.2d 324 (In re Rosenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Rosenfeld, 11 A.D.2d 324, 205 N.Y.S.2d 189, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On February 18, 1960, respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crime of attempted extortion, which is a felony (Penal Law, § 850 et seq.). Pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, respondent then ceased to be a member of the Bar.

The statutory provision is mandatory and upon proof of conviction an order of disbarment follows as a matter of course, notwithstanding the pendency of an appeal from the judgment of conviction (Matter of Lindheim, 195 App. Div. 827; Matter of Scotti, 266 App. Div. 279).

The respondent should be disbarred.

Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Yalente and McNally, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Lindheim
195 A.D. 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
In re Schlefer
266 A.D. 279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.2d 324, 205 N.Y.S.2d 189, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rosenfeld-nyappdiv-1960.