In re Rosenbloom
This text of 254 A.D. 638 (In re Rosenbloom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Final order and judgment modified upon the law and facts by changing the assessed valuation of the property to the sum of $170,000, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Certain findings of fact and conclusions of law disapproved and reversed and new findings and conclusions made. Memorandum: In a proceeding between the same parties to review the assessment of the property in question upon the tax rolls of the city of Syracuse, N. Y., for the year 1936, an order and judgment were granted reducing such assessment to $170,000. The respondent-property owners upon this appeal claim that the prior judgment is res adjudicata. We agree with this contention, as there has not been any substantial change in the condition of the property or in the conditions in the district in which the property is located. (People ex rel. Warren v. Carter, 119 N. Y. 557; People ex rel. New York Central R. R. Co. v. Bissell, 207 App. Div. 705; Matter of Williams v. Goes, 242 id. 896; leave to appeal denied, 266 N. Y. lviii.) All concur. (The order and judgment reduce the assessment on real property.) Present — ■ Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 638, 3 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rosenbloom-nyappdiv-1938.