In re Rosenblatt's Estate

New York Surrogate's Court

In re Rosenblatt's Estate

103 N.Y.S. 1016, 53 Misc. 659

DecidedJanuary 15, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 103 N.Y.S. 1016 (In re Rosenblatt's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rosenblatt's Estate, 103 N.Y.S. 1016, 53 Misc. 659 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

CHURCH, S.

Counsel for the administrator contends that, as the petitioner is a foreign corporation, it has no right to maintain the present proceeding. The provisions of section 15 of the general corporation law (Laws 1892, p. 1805, c. 687) and section 181 of the tax law (Laws 1896, p. 856, c. 908) do not absolutely prohibit a foreign corporation from suing in the courts of this state. On the contrary, under the provisions of section 1779 of the Code, a foreign corporation is given the same right to appeal to the courts óf this state as are accorded to a domestic corporation, except in the special instances referred to in the sections of the general corporation law and the tax law referred to. As the papers'in this case fail to show that the petitioner herein comes within the prohibition, the objections to its maintaining this proceeding should be overruled.

Motion granted, with" $25 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHURCH, S.

Counsel for the administrator contends that, as the petitioner is a foreign corporation, it has no right to maintain the present proceeding. The provisions of section 15 of the general corporation law (Laws 1892, p. 1805, c. 687) and section 181 of the tax law (Laws 1896, p. 856, c. 908) do not absolutely prohibit a foreign corporation from suing in the courts of this state. On the contrary, under the provisions of section 1779 of the Code, a foreign corporation is given the same right to appeal to the courts óf this state as are accorded to a domestic corporation, except in the special instances referred to in the sections of the general corporation law and the tax law referred to. As the papers'in this case fail to show that the petitioner herein comes within the prohibition, the objections to its maintaining this proceeding should be overruled.

Motion granted, with" $25 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 N.Y.S. 1016, 53 Misc. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rosenblatts-estate-nysurct-1907.