In re Rosenberg-Oldstein Co.

E.D. Louisiana

In re Rosenberg-Oldstein Co.

236 F. 812, 1916 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1332

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana

DecidedJune 26, 1916

DocketNo. 2093

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 236 F. 812 (In re Rosenberg-Oldstein Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rosenberg-Oldstein Co., 236 F. 812, 1916 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1332 (E.D. La. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

FOSTER, District Judge.

In this case one of the bankrupts, Jonas Oldstein, claimed a certain insurance policy as exempt under the Lou[813]*813isiana statute (Act No. 189 of 1914). The policy was issued January 1, 1913, and had cash surrender and loan values after the payment of three annual premiums, which would' not be earlier than January 1, 1915. The Louisiana exemption act was adopted July 9, 1914, nearly six months before the policy was available as an asset. The bankrupt was so adjudicated December 13, 1915, at which date the cash value of the policy had accrued. The referee found the facts in this case to be identical with those in Matter of Bonvillain, 232 Fed. 370, recently decided by this court, and on the authority of that case, considering that the condition of the policy at the date of adjudication governed, ruled against the exemption.

However, it is evident from the Bonvillain Case that the test of .exemption is not whether the policy bad a cash surrender value at the moment of adjudication, but whether the debts scheduled and the cash surrender value both antedated the exemption act. As to the debts that did not come into existence before its passage, the exemption act is valid. And creditors cannot complain as to its exemption, if the policy was not property to which they might have looked for payment prior to the change in the law.

The order of the referee will be reversed, and the trustee directed to surrender the policy to the bankrupt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOSTER, District Judge.

In this case one of the bankrupts, Jonas Oldstein, claimed a certain insurance policy as exempt under the Lou[813]*813isiana statute (Act No. 189 of 1914). The policy was issued January 1, 1913, and had cash surrender and loan values after the payment of three annual premiums, which would' not be earlier than January 1, 1915. The Louisiana exemption act was adopted July 9, 1914, nearly six months before the policy was available as an asset. The bankrupt was so adjudicated December 13, 1915, at which date the cash value of the policy had accrued. The referee found the facts in this case to be identical with those in Matter of Bonvillain, 232 Fed. 370, recently decided by this court, and on the authority of that case, considering that the condition of the policy at the date of adjudication governed, ruled against the exemption.

However, it is evident from the Bonvillain Case that the test of .exemption is not whether the policy bad a cash surrender value at the moment of adjudication, but whether the debts scheduled and the cash surrender value both antedated the exemption act. As to the debts that did not come into existence before its passage, the exemption act is valid. And creditors cannot complain as to its exemption, if the policy was not property to which they might have looked for payment prior to the change in the law.

The order of the referee will be reversed, and the trustee directed to surrender the policy to the bankrupt.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 F. 812, 1916 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rosenberg-oldstein-co-laed-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack