In re Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Rosenberg

86 A.D.2d 851, 450 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15475

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 86 A.D.2d 851 (In re Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rosenberg, 86 A.D.2d 851, 450 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15475 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by Emanuel Rosenberg, a disbarred attorney for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law. By order of this court, dated February 25, 1981, the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for investigation, hearing and report. The report of the committee has been received and it is of the opinion that movant possesses the requisite character and fitness for an attorney and counselor at law. This court adopts the committee’s recommendation; motion granted on condition that movant enroll in a “Bar Review Course” and submit proof by affidavit to this court that he has personally attended said course and has completed same. Pending proof of compliance with the above condition, the reinstatement application will continue to be held in abeyance. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Titone, Lazer and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by Emanuel Rosenberg, a disbarred attorney for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law. By order of this court, dated February 25, 1981, the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for investigation, hearing and report. The report of the committee has been received and it is of the opinion that movant possesses the requisite character and fitness for an attorney and counselor at law. This court adopts the committee’s recommendation; motion granted on condition that movant enroll in a “Bar Review Course” and submit proof by affidavit to this court that he has personally attended said course and has completed same. Pending proof of compliance with the above condition, the reinstatement application will continue to be held in abeyance. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Titone, Lazer and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 A.D.2d 851, 450 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rosenberg-nyappdiv-1982.