In re Rosenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Rosenbaum

60 A.D.2d 1012, 402 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14871

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.2d 1012 (In re Rosenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rosenbaum, 60 A.D.2d 1012, 402 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding, pursuant to statute (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd 4) to have respondent Stephen Rosenbaum, an attorney admitted to the Bar of the State of New York by this court on October 19, 1960, declared to be disbarred and his name struck from the roll of attorneys on the ground that he has ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law competent to practice as such because of his conviction in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, upon a jury’s verdict of violation of the Federal statute (three counts, US Code, tit 18, § 201), two counts of which are felonies and petitioner alleges that they are felonies under New York law. Petition granted (Matter of Chu, 42 NY2d 490). An order will be entered directing that the name of Stephen Rosenbaum be forthwith struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding, pursuant to statute (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd 4) to have respondent Stephen Rosenbaum, an attorney admitted to the Bar of the State of New York by this court on October 19, 1960, declared to be disbarred and his name struck from the roll of attorneys on the ground that he has ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law competent to practice as such because of his conviction in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, upon a jury’s verdict of violation of the Federal statute (three counts, US Code, tit 18, § 201), two counts of which are felonies and petitioner alleges that they are felonies under New York law. Petition granted (Matter of Chu, 42 NY2d 490). An order will be entered directing that the name of Stephen Rosenbaum be forthwith struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 1012, 402 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rosenbaum-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack