In re Rosenbaum Mirror Manufacturing Co.
86 F.2d 1011, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3964
This text of 86 F.2d 1011 (In re Rosenbaum Mirror Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Rosenbaum Mirror Manufacturing Co., 86 F.2d 1011, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3964 (2d Cir. 1936).
Opinion
Order (11 F.Supp. 415), affirmed on the authority of Goldstein v. Johnson (C.C.A.) 3 F.(2d) 228, and In re Rose Shoe Mfg. Co. (C.C.A.) 168 F. 39.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Goldstein v. Johnson
3 F.2d 228 (Sixth Circuit, 1925)
In re Rosenbaum Mirror Mfg. Co.
11 F. Supp. 415 (D. New York, 1935)
In re Rose Shoe Mfg. Co.
168 F. 39 (Second Circuit, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
86 F.2d 1011, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rosenbaum-mirror-manufacturing-co-ca2-1936.