In re Rosenbaum Mirror Manufacturing Co.
86 F.2d 1011, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3964
Opinion
Order (11 F.Supp. 415), affirmed on the authority of Goldstein v. Johnson (C.C.A.) 3 F.(2d) 228, and In re Rose Shoe Mfg. Co. (C.C.A.) 168 F. 39.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Rosenbaum Mirror Manufacturing Co., 86 F.2d 1011, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3964 (2d Cir. 1936).
86 F.2d 1011 (In re Rosenbaum Mirror Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goldstein v. Johnson
3 F.2d 228 (Sixth Circuit, 1925)
In re Rosenbaum Mirror Mfg. Co.
11 F. Supp. 415 (D. New York, 1935)
In re Rose Shoe Mfg. Co.
168 F. 39 (Second Circuit, 1909)